Dworkin denies that there can be any social criterion or set of social criteria that can effectively identify all of the standards a judge. On this basis, the idea of judicial discretion may be contested but only with the. Dworkin and the doctrine of judicial discretion core. Analysis of dworkin on judicial discretion in hard cases cram. The conceptual core of the positivists theory, which dworkin attacks, is the. One litigant is almost always entitled to a decision in her favor as a matter of preexisting legal right. A consideration of professor ronald dworkin s denial of judicial discretion from a united kingdom, and in particular a scottish, juristic perspective. Rules and principles dworkin rejects harts arguments for judicial discretion and defends the near maximal determinacy of the law, claiming that there is a uniquely correct right. Taking issue with classical political liberalism, he argues that liberty and equality are not mutually exclusive, and are indeed inseparable. The republication of the essays in book form is nevertheless a. A state in the exercise of its police power may punish those who abuse this freedom by utterances inimical to the public welfare, tending to corrupt public morals, incite to crime, or disturb the public peace.
Volume 60, issue 21, october 1963 american philosophical association, eastern division, sixtieth annual meeting. In this article professor pannier analyzes these issues through an examination of the theories advanced by the positivists and ronald dworkin. This essay focuses on ronald dworkins attack on legal positivism by means of. They do not have discretion in the strong sense, i. In brief, dworkin maintains that judges have only discretion in the weak sense, i. Ronald dworkin s innovative and politically ambitious work has become essential reading in political and legal theory. A hart 19171992 and ronald dworkin born 1932 over whether or not judges has strong or weak discretion has relevance in this particular issue as its stated by lord justice jacob that conservatives like to insist that their judges are strict constructionists, giving the constitution and statutes their precise meaning and no more while.
Judicial discretion and the concept of law the cambridge. Harts notion of the laws open texture violated dworkin s sense of the process of judging, perhaps drawn from his own experience as a judicial clerk. Among the papers discussed are earlier published versions of chapters 2 and 3 of taking rights seriously. To this matter, harts brilliant student ronald dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in hard cases. Ronald dworkins principle based constitutionalism oxford academic. Ronald dworkin a new philosophy for international law.
Dworkin had taught previously at yale law school and. Hercules decides hard common law cases on grounds of principle weighing rights, not policy. Google scholar noticeable in its absence is dworkin s first publication on judicial discretion. One is the obvious reason that they act out of better motives than those who break the. The doctrine of discretion forces the positivist to treat principles as in 2 a, while a denial of discretion permits one to. This essay focuses on chapter 7, sections 1 and 2, and harts comments about judicial discretion in the context of ronald dworkin s wellknown attack on the idea of judicial discretion in his essay the model of rules. Yet it is also misleading to say that judicial duty prevents discretion. Integrity and consistency of court decisions in ronald dworkins. Scribd is the worlds largest social reading and publishing site.
The nature of the judicial process and judicial discretion. Ronald dworkin university of toronto faculty of law. Ronald dworkin has based his theory of law on his ongoing critique of positivist. This discretion is not licensewe expect prosecutors to have good reasons for exercising itbut there are, at least prima facie, some good reasons for not prosecuting those who disobey the draft laws out of conscience. However the nature of this right answer thesis was a direct response to harts argument on open texture and judicial discretion. Ronald dworkin, beginning in about 1967, has written a series of ar ticles1 attacking the dominant contemporary theory of law, the legal positivism of h.
Notes on ronald dworkins theory of law introduction 1. Harts the concept of law hart 1994 contains many passages. The problem of justifying judicial decisions is particularly acute in hard cases, those cases in which the result is not clearly dictated by statute or precedent. In a series of books and articles published over the last thirty years. In several of his essays, ronald dworkin makes a distinction between principle and policy.
Embarrassing questions lawyers lean heavily on the connected concepts of legal right and legal obligation. The idea of political integrity set out in ronald dworkin s 1986 book, laws empire, was at the time one of the most complex, interesting, and original conceptions in legal philosophy. On not prosecuting civil disobedience brandeis university. Ronald dworkin philosophers and legal scholars have long debated the means by which decisions of an independent judiciary can be reconciled with democratic ideals. The doctrine of discretion and theory of legal obligation turn out to be unwanted implications of the model of rules applied to judicial decisionmaking. Dworkin argues that the model of rules provides an incomplete and inadequate characterisation of the nature of legal argument and judicial reasoning and, hence, of law, by virtue of its failure to recognise that judges are. The original place of publication for all included essays is given. Antislavery and the judicial process 1975 times lirerury supplement, 1437 december 5, and a discussion of one case in ronald dworkin. Os precedentes judiciais no constitucionalismo brasileiro. The theory of ronald dworkin other bibliographies cite.
For dworkin s earlier discussion of discretion, see ronald dworkin, judicial discretion, 60 j. Dworkins rights thesis university of michigan law school. Dworkin returns to the subject in dworkin, hard cases, supra note 3, at 8485. December 11, 1931 february 14, 20 was an american philosopher, jurist, and scholar of united states constitutional law. Gial victoria karlsson university of massachusetts amherst follow this and additional works at. Ronald dworkin s earlier work advocated that there exists a unique right answer for a vast majority of cases. Ronald dworkin yale law school dworkin on judicial discretion professor dworkin s paper contains some good things, but i shall focus on what nmost needs repair. Pdf empirically testing dworkins chain novel theory. All that positivist legal theory can say about this situation is thatitis.
A that the law includes principles, which are not rules. At the time of his death, he was frank henry sommer professor of law and philosophy at new york university and professor of jurisprudence at university college london. While brink inds some unanswered questions about the signiicance for dworkin s view of judicial interpretation of normative. In his essay the model of rules, professor ronald dworkin argues. In addition, dworkin did not include the limitations and complexities of language as an obstacle to his thesis. Dworkin summarily rejects the noble dream theory of law, which he refers to as mechanical jurisprudence, arguing that it cannot account either for evolutionary change in the common law or for the fact that judicial decisions are often controversial within the legal community. Pdf ronald dworkin, taking rights seriously richard. The law is gappy, but these gaps are gradually lled in over time by the exercise of judicial discretion.
Analysis of dworkin on judicial discretion in hard cases. Hart, ronald dworkin, legal positivism, the primary rules and secondary rules. In a series of recent papers professor ronald dworkin has presented a critique of the legal positivists analysis of law as typified by the work of h. Does dworkins rights thesis succeed in solving the. Ronald dworkin has relentlessly attacked the positivist view according. Ronald dworkin is perhaps the most inluential and provocative theorist in legal, political, and moral philosophy in the past half century. Dworkin s articles, while largely critical, go far. Bibliography of ronald dworkins works essays are organized chronologically in descending order, by year, by subject the choice of umbrella subject for those essays falling into more than one category was necessarily a matter of editorial choice. Ronald dworkins right answer thesis oxford scholarship. Ronald dworkins attack on hla harts theory of law youtube. It begins by outlining harts approach to judicial discretion and, in rebuttal, dworkin s theory of hard cases. Ron ald dworkin, foundations of liberal equality, in 11 the tanner lectures on human.
Judicial discretion ronald dworkin journal of philosophy 60 21. Conversely, in the united kingdom, where no such document exists, judicial discretion is the only mechanism whereby the judiciary may. Ronald dworkins the moral reading of the constitution. Steiner, judicial discretion and the concept of law, 1976 camb. Dworkin s strategy against the model of rules is to establish.
Does a judge simply just apply rules to the facts of the case. Dworkin oup uncorrected proof revises, fri mar 04 2016, newgen. Judicial decisions as entitlements is the best defence of precedent in the rights thesis. And against traditional interpretations of law, he argues that law must be understood by comparing it to a collective novel, a mixture. Situating ronald dworkin in contemporary indian jurisprudence, 1 intl j const. The claim that judicial discretion is a consequence of other positivist positionsfor example, the view that rules do not resolve all cases and the view that in hard cases there are no preexisting rightsand not an argument for those positions is first clearly suggested by dworkin in his introduction to the philosophy of law 67 r. Yet it is also misleading to say that judicial obligation precludes discretion. By examining harts discretion and dworkin s interpretivism, i develop a set of requirements to inaugurate a new theory of judicial decisionmaking. As dworkin says, to say that judges have discretion is to misrepresent the nature of judicial obligation dworkin, discretion, 637. Harts the concept of law hart 1994 contains many passages that have become iconic for legal theory. However, the foundation of that thesis, and dworkin s justification of adjudication as against arguments from. Judicial discretion ronald dworkin jurisprudence discretion. Ronald dworkin is professor of law at yale university.
This essay focuses on chapter 7, sections 1 and 2, and harts comments about judicial discretion in the context of ronald dworkin s wellknown attack on the idea of judicial discretion in his. Of course, the importance of rules as a basic building block of law can hardly be doubted, but it is argued that judicial discretion can also be a powerful tool when it comes to making judgements within the law. This is a video lecture about the criticism or objection mostly from model of rules i, which appears in dworkin s book taking rights seriously that ron. This paper utilizes the hart dworkin debate to normatively deliberate regarding how judges ought to make decisions. In this first section the theories are dealt with on their own termsas purely legal theories, with no application to football. A note on dworkin and precedent wiley online library. Skubik, daniel w judicial discretion and legal reasons. Dworkin goes at great lengths to criticise thesis 6that the law is sometimes indeterminateaccusing positivism of supporting this thesis through a confusion of two senses of discretion. Dworkin tangles two questions understanding the restrictions in his note 6. Ronald dworkin has defended with energy and eloquence the. Judicial discretion ronald dworkin free download as pdf file.
1266 1348 1580 114 137 1279 26 50 168 878 969 934 706 1387 1581 671 1585 617 1527 998 321 1089 884 666 941 1758 743 128 854 1788 627 1592 236 1326